> More precisely ? Any better idea ?
I'd have a separate env var for it.
> We already use +user/-site/+core to give access to the "standard" > parts of the paths.
Well, but it doesn't give paths to plugins. It gives paths to dirs CONTAINING plugins. To then mix dirs with plugins, with names of plugins, is icky.
« Back to merge proposal
> More precisely ? Any better idea ?
I'd have a separate env var for it.
> We already use +user/-site/+core to give access to the "standard"
> parts of the paths.
Well, but it doesn't give paths to plugins. It gives paths to dirs
CONTAINING plugins. To then mix dirs with plugins, with names of
plugins, is icky.