>>>>> John Arbash Meinel <email address hidden> writes:
<snip/>
> So we don't keep the selftest output itself?
This doesn't interfere with the existing behavior to avoid fallouts.
> (when using --subunit we record the absolute times as it runs.)
> Which means failing tests give you pretty accurate timing, which
> is one of the reasons I'm doing it. (That and because it allows me
> to run things without adding them to a real branch.)
Right, I want to keep that behavior.
But we don't get the subunit output at all for successful landings nor
do we get subunit outputs for others submissions. So I went a different
route.
>>>>> John Arbash Meinel <email address hidden> writes:
<snip/>
> So we don't keep the selftest output itself?
This doesn't interfere with the existing behavior to avoid fallouts.
> (when using --subunit we record the absolute times as it runs.)
> Which means failing tests give you pretty accurate timing, which
> is one of the reasons I'm doing it. (That and because it allows me
> to run things without adding them to a real branch.)
Right, I want to keep that behavior.
But we don't get the subunit output at all for successful landings nor
do we get subunit outputs for others submissions. So I went a different
route.