On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 01:54 +0000, Martin Pool wrote:
>
>
> Perhaps we should move them all to bzrlib.servers. Then we can assert
> that module is not loaded when it is not needed, and we can allow for
> currently limited servers to grow into being more generally useful. I
> think we have some intentionally limited transports in b.transport and
> I don't see that as essentially problematic. It's more important that
> the class name make its limitations clear.
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 01:54 +0000, Martin Pool wrote:
>
>
> Perhaps we should move them all to bzrlib.servers. Then we can assert
> that module is not loaded when it is not needed, and we can allow for
> currently limited servers to grow into being more generally useful. I
> think we have some intentionally limited transports in b.transport and
> I don't see that as essentially problematic. It's more important that
> the class name make its limitations clear.
This sounds fine to me too.
Perhaps bzrlib. transport. servers. * ?
-Rob