>
> An interesting thing about phrasing it like that, is that it makes it
> obvious that the sort is inefficient: better to just sort on Desc(id)
> - that is precisely the same sort because ids are allocated
> sequentially, and under half the work for the DB.
>
> An interesting thing about phrasing it like that, is that it makes it
> obvious that the sort is inefficient: better to just sort on Desc(id)
> - that is precisely the same sort because ids are allocated
> sequentially, and under half the work for the DB.
Done.