This is a nice, simple change. One potential issue: you removed the requirement that DDEBS not be counted, and you removed the associated test - good. This means that DDEBS should now be included in the archive size, but I see no test asserting that this is true. A previously excluded number is now included in the sum total archive size - some test somewhere should have changed to reflect this.
But maybe not - if you feel that my worry is unfounded, then feel free to land this. The code looks good. r=mars
Hi William,
This is a nice, simple change. One potential issue: you removed the requirement that DDEBS not be counted, and you removed the associated test - good. This means that DDEBS should now be included in the archive size, but I see no test asserting that this is true. A previously excluded number is now included in the sum total archive size - some test somewhere should have changed to reflect this.
But maybe not - if you feel that my worry is unfounded, then feel free to land this. The code looks good. r=mars
Maris