Code review comment for lp:~jml/launchpad/link-to-lp-revision

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Brad Crittenden <email address hidden> wrote:
> Review: Needs Information code
> Hi Jono,
>
> I don't have any suggestions for doing it better.  But I wonder why you want a link to the branch here to the stable branch instead of to the devel branch or even https://dev.launchpad.net/Getting

The devel branch has very little to do with what's on edge, and is to
my mind merely a convenient mechanism for queueing up changes to the
stable branch. To put it another way, why would we link to broken code
when we can link to a known-good branch?

I don't link to Getting because part of the motivation for the link is
to make it easy to see a revision log. I don't know whether that's a
good enough reason.

Thanks for the review.
jml