Code review comment for lp:~lifeless/testtools/details

Revision history for this message
Jonathan Lange (jml) wrote :

The code quality is good, a couple of minor points.

 * Please add a comment explaining the reason for the guarded import. It's for Python compatibility, right?

 * There's a typo in the getDetails docstring. "detials".

 * Probably add a pointer to the addDetail pointing to the TestResult docs

 * I don't know how much I like using "detail" in the singular as a technical term for one of these things. I can't think of an alternative, so let's leave it for now. If you can think of something better, that'd be great. Please not "adsorb" though.

« Back to merge proposal